Home > Art, consciousness, cosmology, Mysticism, Perception, philosophy, physics, Relativity, science, spacetime, universe > Theorelativity: A Scientific Pseudoscience

Theorelativity: A Scientific Pseudoscience

22squarespiral

Advertisements
  1. January 5, 2014 at 4:04 pm

    Certainly amazing art, if not science.

  2. January 5, 2014 at 4:26 pm

    stuff is so intriguing!

  3. Otmar
    January 5, 2014 at 4:30 pm

    Seems like I can’t get away from you. I was doing some work with “Dialetheism”, and came across a forum where you commented on it. In the post you mentioned “JC Beall”. I had him for a couple of philosophy courses at Uconn, and we still occasionally exchange comments.

    My recent comment to him was, “All possibilities are actualized”. : )

    • January 5, 2014 at 4:53 pm

      Haha. Hows it going? Happy New Year. I think that Dialetheism is important when it comes to consciousness, since it’s the frame of everything, we can’t expect the frame to follow the rules of the picture. It makes sense that the Totality should transcend either/or expectations that arise within some frame within it.

  4. Otmar
    January 5, 2014 at 4:34 pm

    Why this recent pre-occupation with Energy and force?I thought their was no energy.

    • January 5, 2014 at 5:10 pm

      From the Absolute perspective, I maintain that there is no literal energy, because there is already affect and effect under sense. You’re right though, I am preoccupied lately with matching up the public side more explicitly with the private side. Even though the public side is ultimately only a recap of nested privacies, our local view gives us a realism that is made of matter and changes to matter (which we call energy). Because the way that matter changes is orderly in a way that matter is not, considering it a separate thing, figuratively, is perfectly ok, just as considering information to be a separate thing is ok too as long as we don’t take it absolutely literally. It’s all in what orientation that we start from. If we put energy on top, then matter and information are equally absorbed. If we put information on top, then matter and energy are absorbed. When it comes to the public side of sense, I put matter on top because that is what we encounter naturally and directly. Unless we are planning to dematerialize into rays of warm light or strange loops of code, I maintain that this is the more grounded and accurate view. Seeing energy as qualia reflected publicly as Δmatter, and information as Δmatter re-reflected back into qualia as quanta, it makes it easier to see the unity of all phenomena stemming from self-masking sense experience.

  5. Otmar
    January 6, 2014 at 11:20 am

    Sounds like your having fun. Very creative. Very good.

    E = C = m

  6. Otmar
    January 7, 2014 at 1:15 pm

    Are affect and effect emergent phenomena?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergent_phenomena

    • January 7, 2014 at 2:30 pm

      No, I think that they are the primordial phenomena which appearances of emergence diverge from.

  7. Otmar
    January 7, 2014 at 1:29 pm

    In terms of your equations, matter, energy and sense are one. And, in those terms, sense is the agent that directs the transformation of matter (form) into energy, and vice versa. Thus, all possible visible or invisible particles that you recognize possess sense. Is that right?

    Hence, matter and energy are sense.

    Atoms and molecules are stated, although we cannot see them with the unaided eye. The smaller particles that make them up become “smaller and smaller”, finally disappearing from the examination of any kind of physical instrument, and these help bridge the gap between unmanifest sense and manifest reality. (?)

    • January 7, 2014 at 2:43 pm

      “In terms of your equations, matter, energy and sense are one. ”

      Not exactly. Matter and energy are sense making itself seem remote. They are objectifications of affect-effect as form, function.

      “sense is the agent that directs the transformation of matter (form) into energy, and vice versa”

      Sense is all agency. We are sense. We do not transform matter into energy, we just move our selves and focus our attention. From a distance, that looks like energetic changes to matter.

      “Thus, all possible visible or invisible particles that you recognize possess sense. Is that right?”

      Nothing possesses sense exactly, not forms or functions anyhow. It is sense that possesses everything. What we see as particles may be the tip of the iceberg of an experience that lasts for billions of years and billionths of a second. It looks like particles to us because our experience is inside of it.

      “Hence, matter and energy are sense.”

      No, I think they are sensible representations of sense. Sense is energy and matter, but all of the matter and energy in the universe put together does not create even one possibility of sense.

      “Atoms and molecules are stated, although we cannot see them with the unaided eye. The smaller particles that make them up become “smaller and smaller””

      I think just the opposite…there may be nothing that makes up atoms which is like a particle. Instead, they are less-and-less like what we think we are measuring, and more and more like measurement itself. Measurement can be though of as the ‘square root of mass’ – the sense of planting an “effective” flag in shared affect, from which comparisons can be made. This is closer to what matter is, not particles, but circumscribed measurements.

      Good questions, btw, it ties in with what I’m about to post.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Rationalising The Universe

one post at a time

Conscience and Consciousness

Academic Philosophy for a General Audience

yhousenyc.wordpress.com/

Exploring the Origins and Nature of Awareness

DNA OF GOD

BRAINSTORM- An Evolving and propitious Synergy Mode~!

Musings and Thoughts on the Universe, Personal Development and Current Topics

This is a blog where I explore spiritual and personal development themes and ideas. © JAMES MICHAEL J. LOVELL, MUSINGS AND THOUGHTS ON THE UNIVERSE, PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT AND CURRENT TOPICS, 2016-2020, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Paul's Bench

Ruminations on philosophy, psychology, life

This is not Yet-Another-Paradox, This is just How-Things-Really-Are...

For all dangerous minds, your own, or ours, but not the tv shows'... ... ... ... ... ... ... How to hack human consciousness, How to defend against human-hackers, and anything in between... ... ... ... ... ...this may be regarded as a sort of dialogue for peace and plenty for a hungry planet, with no one left behind, ever... ... ... ... please note: It may behoove you more to try to prove to yourselves how we may really be a time-traveler, than to try to disprove it... ... ... ... ... ... ...Enjoy!

Creativity✒📃😍✌

“Don’t try to be different. Just be Creative. To be creative is different enough.”

absolutephilosophy

An idealistic blog where those who are searching/wandering/questioning can find an absolute qualia.

zumpoems

Zumwalt Poems Online

The Traditionalist

Revolt Against The Modern World

dhamma footsteps

postcards from the present moment

chandleur

Bagatelle

OthmanMUT

Observational Tranquillity.

Gray Matters

Traversing the blood-brain-barrier.

Writings By Ender

The Writer's Adventure

birddogbooks

The greatest WordPress.com site in all the land!

%d bloggers like this: