Is it Possible That Everything is Made of Information?

“The duality of simulation and physical reality is an illusion like all dualities- the universe is the computation”

It’s simulation that is an illusion. The duality is between information (abstract representation) and performance (aesthetic presentation). Computation is the distance between the two, not the unity. Only awareness can project a representation – representations themselves are inert.  To quote a friend, “Math/ physics is ‘the map’ and Awareness per se is the ‘territory’.

Information does not account for the aesthetic qualities of sensation, feeling, and direct participation which comprise the universe. Because of the great success of the instrument of our era, the computer, many find it irresistible to use the metaphor of information processing to describe the brain, genetics, or physics itself. This is in keeping with the historical trend of describing the universe in terms of the newest and most sophisticated technology. In the industrial era, the universe was considered by many to be a machine, before that a clock, etc.

In my view, this is also a reaction against the anthropomorphic tendencies of religion. Many who view deity concepts as backward and superstitious are subconsciously compelled to the opposite polarity. If the universe is not teleological and divine, then it must be mechanical and generic. If the image of a conscious creator is absurdly naive, then the image of an unconscious process of calculation must be the height of sophistication.

The idea of information as universal is not without appeal. Certainly it provides enormous, even Godlike flexibility, so that no matter what phenomena we find in the universe, from gravitational lensing to the feeling of dizziness, “information” serves as the machina ex deus to religion’s deus ex machina. We have substituted sophisticated unrealism for naive realism, turning our own consciousness into an algebraic ‘simulation’ – a function in which sensory representations ’emerge’ as properties of the computations they represent.

In my view, this does not quite work. Like religion, information-theoretic views have an inherent confirmation bias. When it comes to understanding consciousness itself, experiments which are based on measurement alone cannot be trusted to reveal the true nature of measurement itself. Measurement is analogy and metaphor. It can only account for the relation of one phenomena against the index of another, it cannot access the phenomena itself. All conceptualization of forms and functions automatically frame the context so that the appreciation/apprehension of those forms and participation in those functions is overlooked or taken for granted. For this reason, most who favor an info-centric view see information as including consciousness, but this is, in my estimation, a category error. It would be like confusing the code for a program with the electric or motive force that runs a computing machine. They are not merely different, they are diametrically opposed.

A lot of people take offense to Searle’s Chinese Room and project their own lack of understanding onto others, even vilifying Searle himself. Likewise, the Hard Problem of Consciousness written about by David Chalmers and Thomas Nagel are harshly treated for daring to set the qualities of awareness apart from the functions that we associate with it. An array of doctrines, from Logical Positivism to Functionalism, to Determinism, Structured Realism, Computationalism and Eliminativism share a deep and abiding intolerance for any thought which departs from the absolute belief in the disbelief of authentic subjectivity or direct perception. By committing to this ‘representation without presentation’, we make the mistake of amputating no less than half of the universe.

Here are three examples of what I mean. The information of a deck of cards is very easy to compute. Each card gets a number, each suit becomes one of four categories, also numbered with binary codes. You can now play any card game that you care to play. If you want them to look like cards, however, with red and black shapes and royal portraits, that is a much different trick to pull off. You need to invent a video screen, and eyes, colors and shapes, you need to invent human history to give meaning to the prestige of royal rankings. The players themselves need to be conjured into being to supply the intention to win, the significance of competition and improvement. These are things which cannot be simulated from the outside in. Mathematical functions don’t “want” to do anything, and projecting that want onto them selectively is no more scientific than any metaphysical doctrine of religion.

The second example involves computer passwords. Many people have found that using a keyboard-based password is more secure than using a memorized string of text. Knowing were to put your fingers and where to move them allows you to have a very cryptic password without having to know what the characters actually are. This was what Searle was getting at with the Chinese Room. Mechanical copying is not the same thing as understanding. Consciousness has many different levels, and the syntactic-informational level is only one of them. Because that computational level is the most public-facing and generic level, it is also the most universal. The Church-Turing thesis has codified that universality, saying that all computable functions can be digitally emulated. But digital is still not analog, and analog is still representation, not presentation. No matter how much computing we do, programs are no more able to understand the significance of what they are doing than an abacus. They still might have no genuine private experience.

The third example does not even involve consciousness, but aesthetics. As you know, a computer renders geometric shapes on a screen bit by bit. Even vector based graphics rely on a point to point simulation of geometry. When we resize a circle in Photoshop, the circle is erased and recreated as a new circle. All motion is inferred by manipulation of adjacent bits being turned on and off like a marquee effect or cells of a cartoon. The universe of information is one of Cartesian coordinates – charts or cards which display a static reference through which dynamism and animation can be inferred by the conscious viewer. To the computer itself, there is no memory, no perceptual caching of fluid motion. Unlike our perceptions of the real world, virtual realities must be constantly projected and are not grounded in the history of experience and physics. Information is more like the shadows on the wall of Plato’s cave. The only difference is that now we have decided that the shadows must be all there are.

(from Quora question)

Advertisements
  1. Sergey Shevchenko
    May 17, 2016 at 11:21 am

    “Is it Possible That Everything is Made of Information?”

    in the reality there is no this question. Everything indeed is made of Information and this fact – in contrast to anything else that is studied by humans – can be and is rigorously proven in the “The information as Absolute” conception.

    All/everything what exists in our Universe and outside is/are some informational patterns/ systems of patterns that are elements of the absolutely fundamental and absolutely infinite “Information” Set.

    Including Matter and Consciousness in our Universe (and Universe as a whole, of course) are some sub-sets of the Set, i.e. some specifically organized informational systems.
    More see the paper “The information as Absolute” http://vixra.org/pdf/1402.0173v3.pdf
    DOI 10.5281/zenodo.34958

    Cheers

    • May 17, 2016 at 12:32 pm

      If everything were information we would not need a video screen to see the color of data generated by computer programs. Screens deliver color through physics, not data processing. The physics of sensation is what allows us to see, not the presence of bits and bytes.

      • Sergey Shevchenko
        May 18, 2016 at 10:55 am

        The fact that all/everything what exists in our Universe and outside is/are some informational patterns that are elements of the “Information” Set above is rigorously proven yet in 2007, see http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0703043
        (though more complete version see the link in the first SS comment above)

        Including – every human is an informational system, which consists of two bound different systems – mostly material body (with the brain) and mostly non-material consciousness. Thus there is nothing surprising that some informational system (a human) exchange by some informational messages with the external and, at that, correctly understands something in this informational flow.

        Now this fact seems becomes be recognized by more and more people – see
        https://www.newscientist.com/round-up/reality/?cmpid=EMP|NSNS|2016-1505-GLOBAL-maywk3|Reality&utm_medium=EMP&utm_source=NSNS&utm_campaign=MayWk3&utm_content=Reality&cmpid

        Cheers

      • May 18, 2016 at 12:44 pm

        I understand that there is a lot of support for the supremacy of information at this time, but that makes sense to me, given that this time is still very dominated by “Western” models of nature. As I explained, however, there is no way to get from ‘information’ to conscious experience. There is no sequence of numbers or signs which we can write on paper that will turn into a color, flavor, or feeling. This will always be the case. There will never be a piece of software which can produce hardware. Instead, we must reverse the Western model and see that information can only be a product of aesthetic perceptions and participation: conscious experience. Information or quanta, by contrast to qualia, is inert, automatic, and unconscious. It cannot ever develop any sensitivity or care about anything, only step through logical processes blindly like a marble traveling through a maze.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

I can't believe it!

Problems of today, Ideas for tomorrow

Rationalising The Universe

one post at a time

Conscience and Consciousness

Academic Philosophy for a General Audience

yhousenyc.wordpress.com/

Exploring the Origins and Nature of Awareness

DNA OF GOD

BRAINSTORM- An Evolving and propitious Synergy Mode~!

Musings and Thoughts on the Universe, Personal Development and Current Topics

This is a blog where I explore spiritual and personal development themes and ideas. © JAMES MICHAEL J. LOVELL, MUSINGS AND THOUGHTS ON THE UNIVERSE, PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT AND CURRENT TOPICS, 2016-2020, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Paul's Bench

Ruminations on philosophy, psychology, life

This is not Yet-Another-Paradox, This is just How-Things-Really-Are...

For all dangerous minds, your own, or ours, but not the tv shows'... ... ... ... ... ... ... How to hack human consciousness, How to defend against human-hackers, and anything in between... ... ... ... ... ...this may be regarded as a sort of dialogue for peace and plenty for a hungry planet, with no one left behind, ever... ... ... ... please note: It may behoove you more to try to prove to yourselves how we may really be a time-traveler, than to try to disprove it... ... ... ... ... ... ...Enjoy!

Creativity✒📃😍✌

“Don’t try to be different. Just be Creative. To be creative is different enough.”

absolutephilosophy

An idealistic blog where those who are searching/wandering/questioning can find an absolute qualia.

zumpoems

Zumwalt Poems Online

The Traditionalist

Revolt Against The Modern World

dhamma footsteps

postcards from the present moment

chandleur

Bagatelle

OthmanMUT

Observational Tranquillity.

Gray Matters

Traversing the blood-brain-barrier.

Writings By Ender

The Writer's Adventure

%d bloggers like this: