Multisense Realism

“In terms of your equations, matter, energy and sense are one. ”

Not exactly. Matter and energy are sense making itself seem remote. They are objectifications of affect-effect as form, function.

“sense is the agent that directs the transformation of matter (form) into energy, and vice versa”

Sense is all agency. We are sense. We do not transform matter into energy, we just move our selves and focus our attention. From a distance, that looks like energetic changes to matter.

“Thus, all possible visible or invisible particles that you recognize possess sense. Is that right?”

Nothing possesses sense exactly, not forms or functions anyhow. It is sense that possesses everything. What we see as particles may be the tip of the iceberg of an experience that lasts for billions of years and billionths of a second. It looks like particles to us because our experience is inside of it.

“Hence, matter and energy are sense.”

No, I think they are sensible representations of sense. Sense is energy and matter, but all of the matter and energy in the universe put together does not create even one possibility of sense.

“Atoms and molecules are stated, although we cannot see them with the unaided eye. The smaller particles that make them up become “smaller and smaller””

I think just the opposite…there may be nothing that makes up atoms which is like a particle. Instead, they are less-and-less like what we think we are measuring, and more and more like measurement itself. Measurement can be though of as the ‘square root of mass’ – the sense of planting an “effective” flag in shared affect, from which comparisons can be made. This is closer to what matter is, not particles, but circumscribed measurements.

Good questions, btw, it ties in with what I’m about to post.