Home > cosmology, first cause, philosophy, physics > Perspectives on Gravity

Perspectives on Gravity

October 11, 2013 Leave a comment Go to comments

“The universe is shaped exactly like the Earth,
If you go straight long enough you’ll end up where you were.” – Modest Mouse


Newton conceived of universal gravitation as a ratio of mass to distance.

“…every point mass in the universe attracts every other point mass with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.”

Einstein revolutionized classical gravity with General Relativity, merging space with time and formulating the equivalence of mass and energy. Rather than a rigid Cartesian plenum of 3-D space and a one dimensional timeline, Einstein saw a flexible, four dimensional ‘mollusk’ of spacetime contoured by the relations of matter and energy. GR, along with Special Relativity, made the universe a much stranger place, with time dilation, black holes, the relativity of simultaneity, and the constancy of the speed of light as a universal absolute.

Since quantum theory begins at the other end of the cosmological continuum of size, there has been a continuity problem between sub-nuclear physics and astrophysics. Quantum doesn’t match up with relativity very well, so the quest to find a bridge between the two has been a prominent open question for contemporary physics.

Here are a some brief signposts along that highway between QM and GR:

Quantum Gravity:

In most, though not all, theories of quantum gravity, the gravitational field itself is also quantized. Since the contemporary theory of gravity, general relativity, describes gravitation as the curvature of spacetime by matter and energy, a quantization of gravity seemingly implies some sort of quantization of spacetime geometry. Insofar as all extant physical theories rely on a classical spacetime background, this presents not only extreme technical difficulties, but also profound methodological and ontological challenges for the philosopher and the physicist. Though quantum gravity has been the subject of investigation by physicists for over eighty years, philosophers have only just begun to investigate its philosophical implications.

Gravity makes quantum superposition decohere into classical physics.

Weak gravitational waves that fill the Universe are enough to disturb quantum superpositions and ensure that large objects behave according to classical physics. […]  Many theorists now believe that macroscopic superpositions, in which numerous quantum components must maintain a precise relationship with each other, are disrupted by continual environmental influences. Such disturbances, acting differently on each component of a superposition, “decohere” it into a classical state that is, say, dead or alive, but not both. Even a system as small as an atom requires extraordinary protection from stray electromagnetic fields in the lab to remain in a superposition. Since gravitational fields are both pervasive and inescapable, researchers have proposed that they play a fundamental role in ensuring that macroscopic systems behave in a classical way.

Hamiltonian Chaos:

We confirm, in this context, that the dynamics of a Brownian particle driven by space-time dependent fluctuations evolves towards Hamiltonian chaos and fractional diffusion. The corresponding motion of the particle has a time-dependent and nowhere vanishing acceleration. Invoking the equivalence principle of general relativity leads to the conclusion that fractional diffusion is locally equivalent to a transient gravitational field. It is shown that gravity becomes renormalizable as Newton’s constant converges towards a dimensionless quantity.

Dark matter

Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) were proposed to explain the galaxy rotation problem. Unexpectedly, when it was first observed, the velocity of rotation of galaxies appeared to be uniform: Newton’s theory of gravity predicts that the farther away an object is from the center of the galaxy it belongs to, the lower its velocity will be (for example, the velocity of a planet orbiting a star decreases as the distance between them increases). These observations gave birth to the idea that a halo of invisible stuff was surrounding each galaxy: dark matter.

Losing singularity:

In this new model, the gravitational field still increases as you near the black hole’s core. But unlike previous models, this doesn’t end in a singularity. Instead gravity eventually reduces, as if you’ve come out the other end of the black hole and landed either in another region of our universe, or another universe altogether. Despite only holding for a simple model of a black hole, the researchers – and Ashtekar – believe the theory may banish singularities from real black holes too.

Metaphors and Symmetries

Switching gears from the scientific sense of gravity to the personal sense, there are some worthwhile themes to explore. The etymology of gravity links heaviness with seriousness. Gravity relates to grave, and groove. Digging ditches and engraving (scratching). The association with burial and death probably accounts for the connection from grave to words like serious, severe,  and swear. The idea of a sworn oath or an engraved ring relates to a sense of a permanent pledge. There is an intent to hold on steadily against all odds, or all distraction. The root of swear crosses over to answer also – a hint that ‘saying’ something out loud can have serious or permanent consequences.

Serious or grave subjects are often called ‘heavy’ or ‘dense’ while frivolous topics are ‘light’ or refer to things which are airy (fluff, puff pieces). Insubstantial or insincere talk is ‘blowing smoke’. Both the literal and figurative meanings of heavy (literal = heavy weight; figurative = heavy important) have light as an antonym, but it is light in two different figurative senses. The antonym of the literal sense of light is dark, which comes back around to gravity in the form of black holes, where the intensity of gravity does not allow light to escape. It could be said that a black hole is a star’s grave.

Under the influence of gravity, weight, density, and pressure increase. Movement becomes more difficult and slow. More power is required to exert the same force. Metaphorically there is a lot of crossover – feelings of stress are compared to being ‘under a lot of pressure’ is associated with risk or powerlessness. Resistance and inertia figure in, as does entropy. Under pressure, time becomes more valuable, and the tolerance for distractions (nonsense), is lowered. Ideally, the significance of the goal should be worth the effort. Monumental investments expect monumental results.

If electromagnetism is the ‘Spring ‘ of matter’s energy, then gravity is its Fall.  If energy is a fountain which lights the matter into significance, then gravity is the drain which flattens entropy and reverses its disposition into a one dimensional, time slowing presence – mass. Said another way, gravity is the metabolism of spacetime, and the embodied force of entropy.

Entropic Force:

Dr. Thanu Padmanabhan of the Inter-University Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics in Pune, India said Gravity  “is the thermodynamic limit of the statistical mechanics of “atoms of space-time.”

Erik Verlinde, 48, a respected string theorist and professor of physics at the University of Amsterdam, is quoted as saying that gravity is “entropic force.”

Gravity’s symmetry with electromagnetism extends to the metaphysical. The etymology of the words burden and bear go back to the word for ‘birth’. Themes of give and take, and birth and death, wrap around each other. The idea of curvature, of entropy statistically evening out odd statistics and jagged exceptions is an expression of magnitude and relativity. The pull of gravity doesn’t make things spin or orbit, but since the number of velocities that a body can have is so much greater than the number of ways a body can be stationary, entropy ensures that most everything is moving somewhere, and gravity pulls light things close to heavy things faster than heavy things are pulled to light things, causing the lighter moving thing to wrap its path around the heavier mass in an ellipse.

With a black hole, and on Earth, gravity and entropy suggests a connection to loss and absence. Ultimately, gravity shows that even absence turns back on itself, since it can only ever be the sense of its own absence – the presence of the absence of presence. Sense can only diminish relative to itself, it can only appear to be slow or missing by comparison. Gravity is about falling, collapsing, and squeezing the space and time out of incidents to make them co-incidents with shared inertia. Gravity is the force of pseudointentionality, the entropy of entropy. If perception elides its blindness and entropy to concentrate significance, gravity elides in the opposite way, through quantitative density. Anomalies are crushed and drowned into smooth curves until they explode. Stars explode into clouds which collect into other stars, scars of stars, and galactic spiral clouds of stars.

Are teleonomy, evolution, entropy, and gravity the same thing? If electromagnetism and energy represent uniqueness and creativity on every level, gravity and entropy are a statistical rounding off of all of that uniqueness across all the inertial frames. It settles everything into hierarchies of magnitude on the outside and figurative scales of greatness (importance) on the inside.

Extra Credit

Gravity isn’t directly related to time. Although much our timekeeping is modeled after astronomical cycles, neither the rotation of the Earth nor its heliocentric orbit are caused by gravity alone. It seems easy to mistakenly guess that planets have gravity because they spin, as if it were some kind of centripetal force, but the gravity would be almost the same if Earth were not spinning, and gravity itself is not causing the spin in the first place. What we think is that planets condensed from moving clouds of cosmic debris, and when they become smaller, the motion becomes faster (conservation of angular momentum, like a figure skater pulling their arms in for the faster spin).

As far as gravity is concerned, the Earth and Sun only need be drawn together, all orbits, spins, and tilts in the solar system are the residual effects of the events which initially accelerated the cloud of matter into motion or changed its direction. The tilt of the Earth is thought to be the result of collisions with other massive objects during its early history. Without the tilt, you would have no seasons as every position of the Earth’s orbit would produce no noticeable difference. Same with the spin. Gravity doesn’t care if the Earth spins or not.

What gravity does do for time is provide conditions of relative permanence that would not exist otherwise. Without gravity we could still keep track of cycles of time, but they would be forever be changing completely as our view of the universe changes permanently from a non-orbiting planet hurtling aimlessly through space. Gravity provides a frame of circularity which allows greater degrees of order in our perception. Gravity doesn’t make time, but it makes it more relevant.

  1. October 12, 2013 at 12:23 am

    This post has been my favorite in recent weeks. I’ve had some difficulty reading some of your stuff, however this one was a breeze. Thanks for your perspective. Here’s another perspective on the matter for you to consider. Tetryonics isn’t new to you I’m sure, but I think in this case we could all gleam something deeper with something like Tetryonics in mind.


    The Gravitational & Electric Constants are both the result of the underlying super-positioned energy momenta required to produce a given force between two material objects [charged or not].


    • October 12, 2013 at 3:28 am

      Thanks Richard!

      For me, understanding physics in general and Tetryonics in particular seems to be a permanently tantalizing prospect. For whatever reason, my language-based mind can only absorb thimblefuls of hard science at a time, and even then, it tends to fade fast. I need to see big, bold, simple concepts that tie everything together, and then real world examples to drive it home. As soon as I see a variable my mind wanders,

      In the not so back of my mind, I feel like if someone fully grasped Tetryonics, MSR, and Erik Andrulis’ theory they would have a model of physics that is 200 years of its time.

      Could ‘underlying super-positioned energy momenta’ be what I call ‘motive’? What about magnetic force (which I associate with the sensory part of sensory-motive…affect-effect)? Is there real world support for the fusion of gravity and EM? It seems a little off, for instance, does gravity affect conductivity or permittivity and all that? Can EM be used to generate anti-gravity? I want them to be symmetric but I don’t know enough about the reading the equations to get a sense of what’s missing.

      Even if they don’t match up as I want them to scientifically, on the metaphorical-cosmic level they seem well suited to the simple symmetry, and I think the light-dark/light-massive/light-serious line of thinking has promise. Something about the duality of EM contrasting with the unsingularity of gravity…it reflects the trans-measurability of sense and the anti-trans-measurability (cardinality) of information.

      Anyhow, thanks for reading and I will try to take a crack at the video soon.

  2. October 14, 2013 at 4:25 pm

    Thanks for this. 🙂 If I can throw another topic out there – which you can totally ignore if it bores you – but, what about an MSR take on evolution?

    • October 14, 2013 at 7:09 pm

      Thanks. I’m not sure I have anything interesting to say about evolution, other than that it has to do with the particular shapes of bodies and their behaviors rather than the stories that can be told through those bodies. It’s like gravity in that it is a statistical teleonomy rather than an intentional teleology, but I do think that evolutionary psychology frequently oversteps its mandate and projects itself into private physics. I am always conscious of how a city looks from the air and how easy it would be to formulate a theory of how traffic patterns evolve based on the shapes of cities, and how radically incomplete such theories would be if we believed that they explained the growth of cities. By default, I think everything in evolutionary psych is based on a just-so story until proven otherwise.

      If I think of some other stuff I’ll get a post together though.

  3. October 14, 2013 at 7:46 pm

    I suppose what I want to know is: in what “sense” does the concept of evolution allow mind to make sense of itself? Should we keep it or let it go? It’s certainly the dominant intellectual paradigm right now. What is so mesmerizing about it as a explanatory framework? Also, what does evolution imply about the future of sense? But, no pressure. I enjoy reading about whatever topic strikes your fancy.

  4. Seshu
    October 17, 2013 at 6:55 am

    It’s nice with solid stuff about one of the biggest puzzle in physics, the marriage between QM & GR : ) I hope this will be solved at least in my lifetime so I go from this world with an astonishment how Nature hide its secrets !!! Thanks for nice article.

    • October 17, 2013 at 11:30 am

      Thanks for reading! There seems to be something strange about gravity that makes it more slippery than other fundamental aspects of nature. If entropy is the sum of all unintentional indifference behind all intentionally made differences, then gravity is entropy which has been realized as the frame of spacetime.

      • Seshu
        October 17, 2013 at 7:28 pm

        ok…I believe that all properties of every particle in Nature are emergent properties of some other fundamental reality, this concept is not new but intricately involved in QM results. So also , Gravity must be deduced as an emergent property of space-time. More over space and time must also be emergent properties of what ?? our consciousness !!?? and our consciousness is also emergent property of universal consciousness , the ultimate reality . There is a hidden connection to all these concepts and of course deeply dealt in Hindu philosophy. But to modern science, the mathematical formulation of emergent properties, if properly developed , may answer these puzzles and connections between QM and GR.

      • October 17, 2013 at 7:59 pm

        I agree. I might say ‘divergent properties’ instead, but that would be from the Brahman/Absolute perspective rather than the local.

      • Seshu
        October 17, 2013 at 8:09 pm


  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Shé Art

The Art of Shé D'Montford


Transform your life with Astrology

Be Inspired..!!

Listen to your inner self..it has all the answers..

Rain Coast Review

Thoughts on life... by Donald B. Wilson

Perfect Chaos

The Blog of Author Steven Colborne


Multimedia Project: Mettā Programming DNA


Astral Lucid Music - Philosophy On Life, The Universe And Everything...

I can't believe it!

Problems of today, Ideas for tomorrow

Rationalising The Universe

one post at a time

Conscience and Consciousness

Academic Philosophy for a General Audience


Exploring the Origins and Nature of Awareness


BRAINSTORM- An Evolving and propitious Synergy Mode~!

Paul's Bench

Ruminations on philosophy, psychology, life

This is not Yet-Another-Paradox, This is just How-Things-Really-Are...

For all dangerous minds, your own, or ours, but not the tv shows'... ... ... ... ... ... ... How to hack human consciousness, How to defend against human-hackers, and anything in between... ... ... ... ... ...this may be regarded as a sort of dialogue for peace and plenty for a hungry planet, with no one left behind, ever... ... ... ... please note: It may behoove you more to try to prove to yourselves how we may really be a time-traveler, than to try to disprove it... ... ... ... ... ... ...Enjoy!


“Don’t try to be different. Just be Creative. To be creative is different enough.”

Political Joint

A political blog centralized on current events


Zumwalt Poems Online

dhamma footsteps

all along the eightfold path

%d bloggers like this: